« OCTOBER 9 / Give-and-take with two sharp readers | Main | OCTOBER 10 / More blowback on Georgsson-gate »

OCTOBER 9 / Newspaper ethics and a hypothetical case

TO AVOID getting bogged down in local personalities, let's examine questions of journalistic ethics posed by this imaginary set of facts in a long-ago, far-away land:

An male editor at an award-winning newspaper in Albany, New York, is married to a female attorney. In 2000, the Federal Election Commission reports a $1,000 contribution to the Hillary Rodham Clinton for U.S. Senate Committee, Inc., by an attorney with exactly the same name as the editor's wife -- presumably her. She practices criminal law, but among other services, her "discreet" law firm advertises that it can "monitor and assess the political impact of state and local regulatory and legislative activity for our clients." Albany is, of course, the state capital of New York.

What are the editor's ethical obligations, if any, with respect to his wife's professional activities, the activities of her law firm, and her political contribution? Twenty minutes, 250 words, no copying.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5527a7a6988330105356db38e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference OCTOBER 9 / Newspaper ethics and a hypothetical case:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.